| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

NoResponseAngel

Page history last edited by PBworks 17 years ago

through the looking glass.docCheck out the Jabberwocky on my Wiki!! From, Through the Looking-Glass ~BigYellowPeep

 

 

 

NoResponseAngel

 

PROJECT

 

Final project - Engl 473

 

Well, I have finished my final project. I had to get it done early because I have three really big tests this week and then I'm finished!!! But I'm helping my mother move and I am moving too, so it's very hectic. So, check out my remix and let me know what you think.


April 27, 2007

 

Through the Looking Glass

 


April 20, 2007

GoNZo:

I totally agree about somewhat feeling bad for that kid. Obviously something really bad happened to him as a kid. I read online two of his plays he wrote for a class. It was creepy. It was all about basically him wanting to kill the "step-father" and the "mother" grabbing chainsaws and stuff like that. It's definatly fabricated I would say but it seems like it in a way reflects his childhood. Maybe things that happened to him personally or things he witnessed. Also, I understand exactly what you were saying about feeling trapped but could NEVER hurt anyone especially yourself. I've felt the same way, especailly now with all the stress off school and my parents splitting up. But I could never image feeling so much hurt and stuff do to something like that.

 

Anyway, I missed class yesterday (thurday) because I had to go out of town for a internship interview. Can someone fill me in. Thanks.

 

I ended up taking notes, and I'll post some of them on my page if you want to take a look. -Ceridwen

April 18th (again...more responses between Ceridwen and I)

Ceridwen:

First, thanks for the link. Anyway, we seem to be having a sort of debate here. Thats great! However, I hope I did not offend you in any way because that wasn't my intention. I am just debating your opinions with mine. You do make some very good points about how the media seems to work. Of course, the industry is a money making business, but when journalists are interviewing people who are grieving they do show their condolences (well atleast they are suppose to)and if someone doesnt want to talk to them, journalists push but in the end respect their wishes. Also, about the after these messages thing, that is advertising and PR, a huge part of the media industry. However, I have to say it is a shame that some stupid people give the media such a bad name but I don't think it is as bad as people may seem. (Although, I might be a little blind-sighted by my love for journalism)

 

Ha ha, no harm done and no offense taken. Sorry if my response made it sound like I was upset in some way...I just tend to get enthusiastic about debates. What I've noticed is that we both seem to agree on the main point of my writing...that it was a tragic event that needs to be thought about and discussed, and that the victims are worth remembering. I think, too, that we have similar appreciation for journalism. I'm just a bit more cynical :) - Ceridwen

 

I like all of this rhetoric. What happend was awful, I think we can all agree on that. But people are going to do what they are going to do and it is up to us to accept that grim reality and let go. I pray for the families of those who were killed, but I just can't help but feel sorry for this person, who chose to kill 32 people, and people like him. Questions run through my head like: what kind of childhood did this kid have? What were his parents like? Never have I wanted to hurt anyone or hurt myself, but I have been there - I have felt trapped before. I think we have all felt that feeling in some way or another. And maybe that is why we can all point the finger and this guy and label him as awful or disgusting - because maybe we see a piece of him in ourselves? --GoNZo

 

April 18, 2007

 

In response to Ceridwen's blog about Virginia Tech.:

 

I have to say I am a little bothered by some things that were said in that post. It seemed as though you were bashing the media big time. Being a journalism major, I am fully aware that many people aren't so trustworthy of the media. In the past journalists have done some things to decieve people and perhaps will continue to do so. However, thats not how it all is now-a-days. Ethics and law take a big part in reporting the news and for the most part, those two aspects are taken highly into consideration. As for the Virginia Tech. shootings, the media knew something big was going on from the beginning but did not at the time have the information. If you think about it, someone has to get down there and piecing together information before they get all the information and that can take time. When CNN got a tip yesterday they went with it and gathered information as the day went on. So, what's wrong with that? The media industry is always competeing and when they get a tip that is as big as what happened the other day, they run with it.

Also, you say you don't care about what happened because it doesn't directly affect your life. Well neither did the assassination of Kennedy but that is a big part of history. What happened at Virginia Tech. and for that fact, on September 11th, made a huge part of history. And, for being college students at a campus that could be considered similar to Virgina Tech, it does effect all of us because that could happen anywhere. And take into consideration how Penn State is now looking at safety plans.

 

Well, two things. First, here's a link for you to check out regarding your final project idea. Humpty-Dumpty has made his way into literary and linguistic theory.

 

Second, responding to your response: While I'm sure it could come across that way, I didn't mean to "bash" the media. I've considered going into journalism myself, and I feel that reporters and journalists are a crucial element of our society. They help keep us informed, as well as "keeping people honest" by holding them accountable for their actions. HOWEVER, I feel that often the focus of journalism moves too easily from detailing a story to chasing profits. I understand that they're in competition, but it seems that many of the ideas of ethics taught in college classes on journalism are abandoned. This is especially prevalent with companies like CNN and FOX, which are owned by larger corporations who's primary focus is entertainment, not journalism. And why, when there were probably thousands of other shootings across the globe, did we focus on this one? One, it was huge, and it hit close to home. But two, because it's something large media corporations can sell. Stay tuned for the latest...after these messages. BUY A DODGE. USE AOL. PAY US TO DO YOUR TAXES. Still no new information, folks, but stay tuned.

 

Aside from all of that, I have a serious problem with reporters hounding victims and their families, when those people need to be given time to reflect and grieve and heal. The student who shot the cell phone video of the shootings that was playing all over the place was being interviewed, and said that the media attention was awful and distressing. And now we play the blame game...the man who actually killed people is dead, so we search for a scapegoat. Blame the police, blame the university, just don't blame society in general. And for god's sake don't just let things go. Nancy Grace and Anderson Cooper and the Cafferty guy want stronger laws now...what, thought police? I think therefore I am criminal? I really do think it's disgusting that a tragedy which touches us all is now a source of profit. THAT is what I was trying to say. -Ceridwen


April 13, 2007

 

So, here's what I'm thinking to do for my final project. I want to do a Society of Control remix using children's literature. I don't really have a real purpose but I think it will be interesting to see how the society can control everything. So, I was thinking to pick like 2 or 3 pieces of children's literature to remix and give a little explanation for each, kind of like what we did for the UBIK remix. So let me know what you think (good or bad) and if you have any other suggestions.


April 1, 2007

 

Happy April Fool's Day!

Well since I can't put any type of link on here for my UBIK remix, I decided to just copy and paste. So, here ya go:

(By the way my centering and stuff like that is a little messed up. Sorry)


 

UBIK – Philip K.Dick 23

After Quinton dressed – in a pastel yellow blazer, blue suede shoes and a silk cap – he ran around frantically looking for one ounce of coffee. None. He then focused on the living room and found, by the door leading to the bathroom, last night’s great cape, every spotty blue yard of it, and a plastic bag which contained a half-pound can of authentic Kenya coffee, a great treat and one which only while sloshed would he have risen to. Well, even though Quinton “gets paid a hell of a lot,” and “the firm couldn’t operate without him,” he is having some big financial problems.

In his society of control, all of his appliances and doors in his apt make him pay to use or to enter. It’s annoying when you can’t even get a glass of water without your refrigerator snapping at you.

A society of control can be beneficial because it can be “stability within the system's scope”. However, some disadvantages include, “More room for abuse of power - this does not necessarily entail physical or malicious abuse, but the attempts of the controlling class to maintain that control is at the expense of those further down the hierarchy. Stability can also lead to stagnancy and inefficiency within the system.” (http://www.exmosis.net/node.SocietyAndControl)

Back in the kitchen he shuffled through his blazer pockets for a dime, and, with it, started up the coffeepot. Sniffing the – to him – very unusual smell, he again consulted his watch, which made him pay five cents to see the time, saw that fifteen minutes had passed; he therefore briskly strolled to the apt door, turned the knob and pulled on the release bolt.

The door refused to open. It said, “Gimme five cents and I’ll open.”

UBIK – Philip K. Dick 24

He searched his pockets. No more coins; nothing. “Please just let me pay you tomorrow. I don’t have the money at this time and I can’t go get any if you don’t let me out of the apt,” he pleaded with the door. Again he tried the knob. Again it remained locked tight. “What the hell is with this society? How am I suppose to earn a living and save money when I have to have a coin here and a coin there just to get out of my house; I don’t have to pay you.”

“I think otherwise,” the door said. “Look in the purchase contract you signed when you bought this conapt.”

In his desk drawer he found the contract; since signing it he had found it necessary to refer to the document many times. Sure enough; payment to his door for opening and shutting constituted a mandatory fee. Not a tip.

“You discover I’m right,” the door said. It sounded smug.

Quinton sat and pondered what he could do to get out. He was being controlled by his door and all the appliances in his apt. He didn’t want to live in that society anymore. He needed some way out.

From the drawer beside the sink Quinton got a knife; with it he began to unscrew the bolts of his apt’s money-demanding door.

“I’ll sue you,” the door said as the first screw fell out.

“You need to answer three fundamental -- and fairly obvious -- questions as part of deciding whether it's worthwhile to bring a lawsuit:

-Do I have a good case?

-Am I comfortable with the idea of a compromise settlement or going to mediation?

-Assuming a lawsuit is my best or only option, can I collect if I win?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, you probably won't want to sue.” (http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/ObjectID/81D91BD4-99C6-4FA9-A338AB7FB2198FB2/catID/DCA1178C-B579-49DC-AECDFCB8A7E9A20B/104/308/280/ART/)

Quinton said, “I’ve never been sued by a door. But I guess I can live through it.”

A knock sounded on the door. “Hey, Quinton, baby, it’s me, Damien. And I’ve got her right here with me. Open up.”

“Put a nickel in the slot for me,” Quinton said. “The mechanism seems to be jammed on my side.”

A coin rattled down into the works of the door; it swung open and there stood Damien with an evil look on his face. It pulsed with devious force, an unpredictable, gleaming triumph as he propelled the girl forward and into the apt.

 

 

 

 

 

Thinking about how I wanted to remix UBIK, I concluded I wanted to do something that dealt with the society of control. The first thing that popped in my mind was how Joe Chip had to pay to use his appliances and to get in and out of his apt. I made the section all about how Quinton’s society, basically his apt and the appliances in it, is controlling him by making him pay when he is a financial rut.

I also added some of the benefits and disadvantages of living in a society of control, which I found on http://www.exmosis.net/node.SocietyAndControl. As you can see there are more disadvantages than there are benefits.

The door in my remix is supposed to be like some kind of government entity. He has to pay it, it won’t let him do what he wants, and it threatens to sue him. As I mentioned: “You need to answer three fundamental -- and fairly obvious -- questions as part of deciding whether it's worthwhile to bring a lawsuit:

-Do I have a good case?

-Am I comfortable with the idea of a compromise settlement or going to mediation?

-Assuming a lawsuit is my best or only option, can I collect if I win?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, you probably won't want to sue.” Which I found on http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/ObjectID/81D91BD4-99C6-4FA9-A338AB7FB2198FB2/catID/DCA1178C-B579-49DC-AECDFCB8A7E9A20B/104/308/280/ART/.

I changed Joe Chip’s name and clothes to portray him as a different character. I wanted him to seem like a fairly wealthy man (blazer, suede shoes, and silk cap) but still having financial problems in the society he lives in. I also changed G. G. Ashwood’s name to Damien to portray him as the devil. I don’t really have a specific reason for that; however, I wanted him to part of the society that is in control. When the last part of the sentence says: “. . . as he propelled the girl forward and into the apt.” It seemed to me like he was controlling this girl.

In conclusion, I remixed the parts of the two pages of UBIK to be all about the society of control. And, the character not having an easy time in the society. Also, people tend to sign papers without reading its content. If Quinton read his contract for his apt, he would not of had to referred to it to find out that it was part of the contract to pay the door and appliances. Another moral to the story is that, especially in this society, we get ripped off.

 

The remix seemed somewhat disjunctured between its images, but I feel you did a good job of bringing out the larger issues of the society of control topic. The inclusion of the professional law language amplififes the idea of control in the plot.

Grade=B

 

Call Me Ishmael

 

 

I agree with Ishmael in saying that this remix does not seem to flow amazing between ideas. That having been said I still like it. I like how you used Joe and having to pay to use his appliances and get in and out of his apt.

Grade = B

Lifeaswethinkweknowit

 


March 30, 2007

 

Yes I am having some problems getting my UBIK remix on here. When I try to upload it, it tells me my quota has been exceeded. I emailed my problem to Mobius, so hopefully he can figure out how to fix it. If anyone else knows what I can do, let me know. Sorry all.

Anyway, take a look at this

/ video. Being a journalism major, I found this really interesting. Also, a sort of caption thing read: "The medium is the message. Repeat a lie often enough and it will be believed. Change your story and people will forget the old one as it disappears down the memory hole."

 

Also, this little clip can possibly be used for the society of control film festival. I guess.


March 26, 2007

 

Wow, I didnt realize it's been so long since I posted. I found online some kind of video that has to do with society of control. My computer wouldn't download it for some reason but I will find a way to get it on here so you all can see it. Anyway here is my

[UBIK%20remix.pdf / UBIK remix]

 

 

Maybe it's just my computer, but for some reason your Ubik Remix link seems broken -- all I see is funky text and no downloadable file. Anybody else have this problem? -Houdini


March 2, 2007

 

Happy State Patrick's Day everyone! (Even though some disagree agree with it, but I do see your point)

Wait, sorry, I don't understand. According to calendar constantly updated by transmission from Sirius, St. Patrick's Day is March 17. Is everyone (.e., The Phyrst) just pretending it's St. Patrick's Day so they can consume mass quantities of green beer here rather than Panama City, Fla? Even fake Irish holidays, when everyone simulates "Irishness" ( whatever that is!) seem just slightly more worthy if you stick to the calendar. It's almost as though the calendar has become wiki'd...But this time, methinks that this time, another kind of green is involved $$$$...Oh, ok, I just read Ceridwen's eloquent post about the issue...mobius

 

Well first I have to say I'm very pleased with the sort of uproar I've caused with the whole drugs thing. Haha.

 

Anyway, In respone to The Transgenic Involution:

First, I noticed that porn/pornography was mentioned a few times and it made me think about my very odd Media Law class yesterday. We were talking about sexually explicit expression and the "porn industry". We got to hear interviews with Stormy Daniels, a very successful porn star and we also got to hear a very interesting story from our professor about how he got to see a taping of an adult film. I'd rather not get into any detail about the things he told us he saw, I'm not sure I could even say things like that on here! But anyway, it was an uncomfortable class and I'm sure it had to be uncomfortable for my proffesor to see what he saw.

Second, There is talk about Darwinsim. The peacock things is very cool! However, it makes me wonder what is really true. How were we created, made by god or evolved from animals? And, if evolution is true would that make god false?

There is no question that organisms evolve. None. Zero. What this means about either the origin or nature of life, however, is quite open to interpretation. So the answer to your last question is definitely : "No." And it is followed with a question: which god? I wouldn't say there is an "uproar", but a wikidelic dialogue. Keep it going, don't shut it down - why should one kind of green (beer) be legal while another green (bud) is not?

 

Lastly, drugs! But I won't get into that again. Haha.


February 28, 2007

 

Thank you for your input, Gonzo. You mentioned that taking drugs with a "good technique" can be beneficial. Can you elaborate on that more? Because from just that sentence I would have to disagree. I understand somewhat of a differnce now about how mobius said psychedelics were used in a beneficial way in scientific and therapeutic contexts. However, some drugs are illegal! So, say one was to get caught, are they still beneficial?


NoResponse: In response to your original query about "why people take drugs", the researcher Ronald Siegel has argued that human beings have a "fourth drive", a drive to alter consciousness:

Excerpts from THE NATURAL MIND - An Investigation of Drugs and the Higher Consciousness by Dr. Andrew Weil, 1985. "Human beings are born with a drive to experiment with ways of changing consciousness...The desire to alter consciousness periodically is an innate, normal drive analogous to hunger or the sexual drive...The root of the drug problem is the failure of our culture to provide for a basic human need. Once we recognize the importance and value of other states of consciousness, we can begin to teach people, particularly the young, how to satisfy their needs without drugs. The chief advantage of drugs is that they are quick and effective, producing desired results without requiring effort. Their chief disadvantage is that they fail us over time; used regularly and frequently, they do not maintain the experiences sought and, instead, limit our options and freedom...Altered states of consciousness...appear to be the ways to more effective and fuller use of the nervous system, to development of creative and intellectual faculties, and to attainment of certain kinds of thought that have been deemed exalted by all who have experienced them...(They) may even be a key factor in the present evolution of the human nervous system...To try to thwart (their) expression in individuals and society might be psychologically crippling for people and evolutionarily suicidal for the species."

 

Now, as you point out, some plants and compounds have been made illegal while others have been subsidized and celebrated ( cf. the parking lot at any PSU football game). But we are a genetically and otherwise diverse group, we human beings, and some of us are better tuned to some plants and compounds than others. So by making some inebriants legal and others illegal, we are making some ways of being legal and others illegal. Add to this the fact that some of us have a religious practice and connection to the use of these inebriants (( e.g. the Catholic Church use of wine in the Eucharist), and you can see that some religions become against the law (such as Coptic Christianity, Rastafarianism, and Santo Daime). In a country founded by heretics and based on the freedom of religion, this is not an acceptable situation. We will be reading The Religious Freedom Restoration Act after the break - that should provide even more context for your question, which as you see has provoked an interesting thread. Finally: because we now know the human brain works in part through the interaction of different molecules called "neurotransmitters", we know that all of us, whatever we eat or drink, are "on drugs." Consciousness is possible only through the interaction of compounds that would be classified as "drugs." For example, a compound produced in your brain called DMT is very much against the law even though your brain is a not very clandestine factory for producing it. DMT is the active ingredient in ayahuasca, a potent psychedelic medicine used in the Upper Amazon and at the basis of many religions, including the Soga Del Alma, but it is still against the law in the US. How can we make our own brains against the law? Does the State seek to govern our very states of mind? This is the essence of biopower. - mobius

 

Courtney,

 

True, there is a war on drugs that is being raged in this country right now, but it doesn’t take away from the fact that psychedelics and other “drugs” have been used successfully for centuries to connect with Higher Beings and to promote self understanding: please refer to Dr. Mobius’ Noosphere. There is a right “set and setting” as Wilson would say – I think highly programmable drugs such as psychedelics should be taken in combination with clinical psychology – but in our current legal system, taking illegal drugs does not promote the correct “set and setting”. For example, if you take LSD with the thought of the law and consequences on your mind, you might be in for a bad trip. I do not see taking psychedelics in a “war on drugs” environment as beneficial – nor would I recommend it, but imagine a world where psychedelics are legal and where the “set and setting” is proper. Certainly the isolation tank could be considered a psychedelic experience. I suggest you try it out for yourself and tell me what you think. --GoNZo

 

I feel your pain! The world of enlightenment colliding with the world of drugs can get confusing. I'd just direct you to my comment on BigYellowPeep's page, as well as an entry from my page from about 3pm today (2/28/07). Mostly, though, I'd say that each of us reaches our own path of enlightenment (not path TO enlightenment...I think 'enlightenment' is in the journey, not a destination...) in our own way. Drugs, maybe. Meditation, maybe. Who knows? It's all within you. ~ Ceridwen

PS: (sorry for commenting again), re: "Drugs are illegal!" Well, so what? For example, in Pennsylvania: It is illegal to sleep on top of a refrigerator outdoors; any motorist who sights a team of horses coming toward him must pull well off the road, cover his car with a blanket or canvas that blends with the countryside, and let the horses pass; a special cleaning ordinance bans housewives from hiding dirt and dust under a rug in a dwelling; and you may not sing in the bathtub. Well hot damn. I was going to sleep on top of my refrigerator outside tonight, but I guess I won't, because it's illegal. My point is that perhaps rather than dislike drugs because they're illegal, perhaps we should dislike or like drugs for what they are, and have more sensible and reasonable laws. Step outside the framework we were raised in! Question the society of control that has made them illegal! Nay, I cry: SING IN YOUR BATHTUB!!! ~ Ceridwen


 

February 25, 2007

 

In regards to the picture i posted yesterday: I feel like I've seen it before somewhere or somehow but I don't know where or why I would have seen it. I've been racking my brain trying to think of how or where I know this picture from but I still have no answers!

 

Anyway, in class we were talking about psychidelics (or however you spell it) and my question is why do people do drugs? Is it out of curiosity, or peer pressure, or because they think it makes them feel better about themselves? What some people don't realize is that drugs don't solve any problems; you might think they do for a short period, but reality is, the problems are still in existence when you come down. I guess in a way I could be somewhat of a hypocrit here because I smoke, but I never have nor never will touch anything but that..well and of course alcohol. Some people don't know when to stop either, for example an ex-good friend of both me and my boyfriend put himself in jail twice by the age of 20. Once for possession of cocain and second for failing a piss test in drug court. He also lived in a halfway house for the last couple months. He just got out about 5 days ago. Friday night, when he was high, he called my boyfriend to invite us to a party at his house! All i have to say is, STUPID!!!

 

Okay, I'm done with my rant and sorry if I offended anyone.

 

I think you have raised a really good question Courtney. I think people do drugs for a lot of different reasons. Some do it to escape themselves, and some do them to find themselves. But there is a problem with both of these reasons. I will relate it to weightlifting because that is what I know best. If you are a weightlifter and you are practicing everyday with good technique, you are going to achieve good results. If you are practicing at the same intensity with bad technique, you are going to reinforce bad results. Taking psychedelics when you are not in the right frame of mind is a lot like the later example. Thus, psychedelics can sometimes compound emotional problems. Yet, taking drugs with "proper technique" can be very beneficial, I believe. I wonder what other people think who have had experience with this issue? --GoNZo

 

I would like to weigh in on the drug convo, if it's not too late. I completely understand what you are saying about drugs being stupid and where that comes from. Two of my good friends are currently under the watchful eyes of wardens, sitting in cement cells, thinking about what they "did wrong." I understand that what they did was not considered to be "right" under the rigid moral guidelines established by the government over the past fifty years, but do they deserve to lose a year of their life because of it? I would have to say no. I would have to argue that they may have made a mistake in choosing to behave the way they did in relation to the drugs, but there is no way that making a mistake or a bad decision like that should have such drastic results. What we need is for people to start being responsible when using drugs. For example, people need to stop drinking excessively and then driving. But you don't see these people going to jail for a year, do you? Most often, if it's the first offense, people get a ticket, they get their license taken away, and they have to do some community service. People in general just seem to be fairly irresponsible and make major mistakes involving these types of substances. However, the judicial system is completely skewed when it coems to this kind of thing. What our friends need is help and encouragement to do more with their lives than just party and go crazy, and I hope that they all get it. Peace -BM


 

February 24, 2007

 

"My own opinion is that belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence. The more certitude one assumes, the less there is left to think about, and a person sure of everything would never have any need to think about anything and might be considered clinically dead under current medical standards, where absence of brain activity is taken to mean that life has ended." -Robert Anton Wilson

 

WoW! That's powerful. I definatly like it and in some way agree.

 

 

I saw this picture on a website about Circut 8 Model by Robert Anton Wilson and I thought it was neat.

 

February 18, 2007

 

Those of you who played Mind Controldid you figure it out? The first four steps, the number will always come out to 4 which equals the letter D. Then it goes by the most likely things people will pick, such as Denmark, elephant, gray, kangaroo, orange. I had my one friend do it and instead of elephant, she picked elk. Needless to say, she wasn't too impressed when it came out wrong. Well, I hope whoever played it enjoyed it until now. haha


 

 

play this Mind Control game. At first I thought it was amazing. Let me know what u think.

 

 

***VERY WEIRD!!! Though, I didn't have anything to do with Djibouti in my list of stuff. I gotta say I always liked the way that country's name sounded. -RoBoCoP***


 

February 14, 2007

 

Wow, it has been a while since I've posted! There is just not enough hours in a day.

 

Anyway, I agree with the few people who said they are confused by Ubik. I kind of think I know what is going on but I'm not really sure. This SciFi stuff isn't my thing. So, I assume that it's suppose to take place in the future. I hope our future isn't like that because it's just way too weird. Also, what is Ubik? I noticed at the beginning of each chapter it is referred to as things such as salad dressing, alcohol, and i think even shaving cream. Can it be anything?

 

Off the topic: I was just reading for my Media Law class and I came across something interesting. There has always been a lot of talk about how music, video games, and movies influence people. As in killing. Honestly, I think that's BS! The latest movie I watched was "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The beginning" So I'm not going to go hack up people with a chainsaw now just because I saw it in a movie. Anyway, cases such as these have been thrown out of court so many times because there wasn't enough evidence that this "entertainment" was the influence of peoples' rage. For example, In 2001 a Louisiana trial court dismissed a lawsuit against Warner Brothers and others brought by plaintiffs who claimed that a robbery and shooting at a convenience store was the result of the thieves attempting to mimic characters from "Natural Born Killers." There were many other cases thrown from appellate courts and if they made it through there, more than likely they would not have been granted a writ of certiorari by the Supreme Court.


 

February 8, 2007

 

So, is it fair to say that a primitive culture is lazy? Okay, Clastres mention how these people only worked 2 months a year or something but don't you think the advance in technology has made us lazy? I look at it like this: For example, the remote control or tv guide...we don't even have to move off the couch to find something to watch. We watch the tv guide channel, find something that interests us then hit buttons and we're done. Also, "Lazy like an Indian"? I don't understand how an Indian was lazy. Yes, they went out and hunted for food. They had to use a bow and arrow or whatnot to find an animal to kill then probably had to de-fur and skin it. (I don't know really what they had to do but I'm sure it was a long process). Now, when we want food, our "hunting" consists of driving to a nearby store and trying to find the aisle where what we want is located. Another option, find a phone and have food delivered right to our door.

 

Therefore, I believe our society/culture is LAZY! Which is one of a few reasons for obesity (a now rising problem). Kids don't even want to go outside and "play" anymore or ride a bycicle. They sit on a couch and play video games or ride on a motorized scooter.

 

Well Courtney… I lost my remote – which you would know if you had been reading my entries. So now I have to get up out of my couch every time I have to change a channel. Lazy? I don’t think so. --GoNZo

 

P.S. Gonzo--I do read your blog along with everyone elses.

 

January 31, 2007

 

I have to say that the only thing these RFID chips are good for is how Walmart is using them to make smart shelves. The idea that the tags are Big Brothers in small packages is not right. It says that we'll be eating and wearing objects that can track us. Very intrusive!

 

However, I really like Bookworm's idea about putting the tags in jewelry. Also, being female a wedding/engagement ring is a prized possession, and to loose it or have it stolen would be horrible!

 

But my idea is to only put them in like criminals/sex offenders when they get out of jail. That way they stay out of trouble. To share a little story: At home, I worked in an independent pharmacy and basically you know everyone that comes in (they are regulars). Anyway, there is this one guy that always comes in and I can't even look at him. Even though it was a long time ago, he molested his young granddaughter. The weird thing is, he will only talk to me and the two other young girls that work there. He won't talk to the ladies in their mid 40's. Yuck! he makes me sick!!


 

Yea, that story is a little disturbing --GoNZo

 

January 25, 2007

 

RFID Frenzy:

First off, this whole chip thing is a little scary. I would never want someone knowing where I am at all times. That makes people paranoid and did you ever notice that when people know they are being watched, they act different. Also, I saw on the link that it is sometimes used on corpses! That's sick!

 

On the contrary, the link says it is used to prevent theft in art galleries in France and to control government spending. So, I guess in a way that is good. But, I think the whole thing is just too weird.

 

National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace:

 

The First thing that comes to my mind is, is this really possible? Given the reasons for wanting to do this, I agree. I think it would be better for our economy, hopefully preventing such attacks. However, I'm not really sure it can happen. Hopefully my opinion is proved otherwise.

 

TIP: As you're writing in this blog, save periodically. Computers can suck!!


January 24, 2007

 

In class yesterday, John Cage and his silent music was mentioned. I wanted to share something interesting: I had a Music and Theater class last year at Marywood University and we were learing about this composer (I can't remember his name) and he was doing a show. He came on stage, sat at a piano, and didn't do anything. The music was all the sounds the audience was making. For example, the whispering, the zippering of a jacket, or someone blowing their nose. It was weird but then again it was very interesting.

Also, we were talking about external distractions. While even if it is quiet, you still hear creeks and so forth, I believe your mind can also be a distraction. I know that when i sit down to read or something, I distract myself thinking about other things I have to or want to do. Or, just simply daydreaming.

This was indeed Cage -see this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4'33

Mobius/flobius

 


 

January 22, 2007

 

Well, once I got a little instruction, I guess getting connected wasn't as difficult as I made it out to be!

 

I agree with the majority of people who commented that the wiki is a good way for us to express our opinions, thoughts, etc. and build writing skills. I am always game for building writing skills, being a journalism major.

 

In the digital proposal, it is stated that one advantage of the wiki is eliminating plagiarism. I have to say plagiarism scares me. If you turn a paper into turnitin.com it tells you that you plagiarized things that are your own words. Also, to share a little story . . . A friend of mine was accused of plagiarism and has to meet with a bunch of people to discuss it. Her teacher submitted her paper to turnitin.com and it came out that she plagiarized from sources she never even heard of. Therefore, my point is, I like this the most because there is no chance of being even accused of plagiarism.


 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.