Group Project

 


 

Working together using this wiki

 

Think of this wiki as a shared online whiteboard.Our entire group can share information using this wiki, making your research accessible to everyone. Play around with this wiki: Notice how you can add comments to a page, see what people have changed, and edit all the text.

 

 

 

Text generated in response to David Saab Proposal by mobius

Presents

 

An Information Sciences and Technology

Ph.D. Comprehensive Exam (Proposal Defense)

“The Ontology of Tags”

by

Mr. David Saab

Candidate for the Ph.D. degree in the

College of Information Sciences and Technology

Committee Chair – Fred Fonseca

Committee Members – Andrea Tapia, Michael McNeese

and Richard Doyle (English)

Thursday, June 12, 2008

9:00 a.m.

201A IST Building

 

 

 

non representational anatomies US and china

 

cultural difference as obstacle to access to people

 

ethnography question and "member checking"

 

logical framework vs rhetorical framework

 

syllogisms versus enthymeme

 

history of taxonomy

 

"semantic interoperability"

 

asymptote of the noosphere

 

syntax, semantics, pragmatic - Peirce and and semiotic framework

 

phenomenology as first person science - Ruyer

 

non representational tags

 

emergent process = evolution; re-scripting

 

as a generalized tool: publish this in cultural anthropology ( CF.Kelty)

 

"caPTURE"

 

FORVER EVOLOVING INTOLOGICAL TARGET = EVOLUTION

 

 

single objective world

 

"reality isn't objective" tag: mobius ontology; subject/object; processes; systems theory: focal point of the observer

 

rain forest and non representational natural histories

 

UN Humanitarian network

 

history of heidegger in "IST" - heidegger; von forster; matural and varela, Winograd and Flores: Kitler, Ronell, mobius

cultural identities and specification hierarchy - Salthe on Specification hierarch; using specification hierarchies as tags

 

plotnitsky?

 

non referential tags - graffitti

 

ethnography as the discovery of tagging strategies

 

norvig paper on semantics please

 

leximancer

 

 

world as biocultural world

 

"same page" emerges through breakdown in the proposal

 

heidegger's language as tags - "human beings are the ones for whom being is a problem."

 

tagging heidegger! make his language more shareable while preserving its non semantic effect

 

mapping different phenomenological modalities as diferent practices of attention

 

 

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Sherry Rogers wrote:

 

ISTwordmarksolid

Abstract:

Formal ontologies are complex forms of metadata that specify the underlying concepts and their relationships that comprise the information in an information system. Information scientists create ontologies and metadata in order to facilitate the sharing of meaningful information. The most common understanding of ontology in computer and information sciences is Gruber’s "specification of a conceptualization." This definition has held firm in the domains of information science and computer science. However, formal ontologies are problematic in that they simultaneously overspecify and decontextualize information, which in order to be meaningful must be adaptive in context.

In this thesis we introduce the notion of culture to information science as a way of achieving that contextualized adaptability for ontologies. Rather than rely Aristotelian ontology-as-categorization and formal ontologies’ structuring as logical formalisms, we base our understanding of ontology in Heidegger’s phenomenological perspective. Heidegger's notion of being-in-the-world is one in which each of us is immersed in and never separate from an experiential context. This context is the ever-present background that shapes our semantic and ontological commitments to the world around us—helps us make meaning of what we perceive to exist. Moreover, we are always being-in-becoming, experiencing the world as emergent—dynamic, contextualized and with a personal historical perspective. It is this notion of being-in-becoming that allows us to introduce the notion of culture to the study of ontology in information science.

Its role in the creation of meaning makes culture integral to the study of semantics and, consequently, the study of ontologies and information technologies. Based on our understanding of ontologies as cultural schemas, we introduce the notion of creating schematic ontologies with folksonomic tags. We then take this foundation and propose a research agenda in which we explore the use of tag sets as the ontic representations of the underlying ontological conceptualizations, focusing on the phenomenon of collaboration and the process of schema integration in an intercultural research context.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Sources

 

  1. Source 1
  2. Source 2
  3. Source 3
  4. Source 4

 

Source NamePage #Quote
Encyclopedia of Stars44, 46"The stars are the heavens"

 

Meetings

 

When should we meet?

WhoWhen I can meet
Andrea
DavidM-F, 8am-5pm
Fred
Michael
Rich
mobius

 

Drafts

Keep your drafts here so you can refer to earlier versions.

 

Draft 1

Draft 2


Page Information

  • 2 months ago [history]
  • View page source
  • You're not logged in
  • Tags: schemas ontologies tagging tags & intercultural communication heidegger attention

Wiki Information

Recent PBwiki Blog Posts