Think of this wiki as a shared online whiteboard.Our entire group can share information using this wiki, making your research accessible to everyone. Play around with this wiki: Notice how you can add comments to a page, see what people have changed, and edit all the text.
Text generated in response to David Saab Proposal by mobius
Presents
An Information Sciences and Technology
Ph.D. Comprehensive Exam (Proposal Defense)
“The Ontology of Tags”
by
Mr. David Saab
Candidate for the Ph.D. degree in the
College of Information Sciences and Technology
Committee Chair – Fred Fonseca
Committee Members – Andrea Tapia, Michael McNeese
and Richard Doyle (English)
Thursday, June 12, 2008
9:00 a.m.
201A IST Building
non representational anatomies US and china
cultural difference as obstacle to access to people
ethnography question and "member checking"
logical framework vs rhetorical framework
syllogisms versus enthymeme
history of taxonomy
"semantic interoperability"
asymptote of the noosphere
syntax, semantics, pragmatic - Peirce and and semiotic framework
phenomenology as first person science - Ruyer
non representational tags
emergent process = evolution; re-scripting
as a generalized tool: publish this in cultural anthropology ( CF.Kelty)
"caPTURE"
FORVER EVOLOVING INTOLOGICAL TARGET = EVOLUTION
single objective world
"reality isn't objective" tag: mobius ontology; subject/object; processes; systems theory: focal point of the observer
rain forest and non representational natural histories
UN Humanitarian network
history of heidegger in "IST" - heidegger; von forster; matural and varela, Winograd and Flores: Kitler, Ronell, mobius
cultural identities and specification hierarchy - Salthe on Specification hierarch; using specification hierarchies as tags
plotnitsky?
non referential tags - graffitti
ethnography as the discovery of tagging strategies
norvig paper on semantics please
leximancer
world as biocultural world
"same page" emerges through breakdown in the proposal
heidegger's language as tags - "human beings are the ones for whom being is a problem."
tagging heidegger! make his language more shareable while preserving its non semantic effect
mapping different phenomenological modalities as diferent practices of attention
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Sherry Rogers ISTwordmarksolid Abstract: Formal ontologies are complex forms of metadata that specify the underlying concepts and their relationships that comprise the information in an information system. Information scientists create ontologies and metadata in order to facilitate the sharing of meaningful information. The most common understanding of ontology in computer and information sciences is Gruber’s "specification of a conceptualization." This definition has held firm in the domains of information science and computer science. However, formal ontologies are problematic in that they simultaneously overspecify and decontextualize information, which in order to be meaningful must be adaptive in context. In this thesis we introduce the notion of culture to information science as a way of achieving that contextualized adaptability for ontologies. Rather than rely Aristotelian ontology-as-categorization and formal ontologies’ structuring as logical formalisms, we base our understanding of ontology in Heidegger’s phenomenological perspective. Heidegger's notion of being-in-the-world is one in which each of us is immersed in and never separate from an experiential context. This context is the ever-present background that shapes our semantic and ontological commitments to the world around us—helps us make meaning of what we perceive to exist. Moreover, we are always being-in-becoming, experiencing the world as emergent—dynamic, contextualized and with a personal historical perspective. It is this notion of being-in-becoming that allows us to introduce the notion of culture to the study of ontology in information science. Its role in the creation of meaning makes culture integral to the study of semantics and, consequently, the study of ontologies and information technologies. Based on our understanding of ontologies as cultural schemas, we introduce the notion of creating schematic ontologies with folksonomic tags. We then take this foundation and propose a research agenda in which we explore the use of tag sets as the ontic representations of the underlying ontological conceptualizations, focusing on the phenomenon of collaboration and the process of schema integration in an intercultural research context. --
When should we meet?
Keep your drafts here so you can refer to earlier versions.
Sources
Source Name Page # Quote Encyclopedia of Stars 44, 46 "The stars are the heavens" Meetings
Who When I can meet Andrea David M-F, 8am-5pm Fred Michael Rich mobius Drafts
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |